Sunday, March 22, 2015
Friday, March 6, 2015
How does your state rank
What State Has the Lowest Tax Percentage to GDP
I was curious about what states collected the lowest taxes
per state GDP (Gross Domestic Product). This was done to see what level that a
Currency Use Tax (CUT Tax) would be needed to replace all of the state level
taxes.
This snapshot does not included local taxes, federal funds,
or property taxes. Only Indiana collects a property tax at a state level, and I
removed this tax from computation from Indiana to track with other states. The
only tax revenues I include come from state level taxes collected. These taxes
include personal Income, Corporate, Sales, Gambling, and other revenues from
user fees and licensing. That led to the discovery, that Alaska that does not
have Income, or sales taxes. It is an anomaly that I will expand on later.
This data does not include federal funds that were sent to
the states, this could include fuel taxes. I plan on adding this data later,
and include state spending in the mix.
The method is simple, I collected state budgetary data from
a data clearing house called Ballotpedia.org (http://ballotpedia.org/Main_Page)
to find individual state revenues. Then I gathered the State GDP data from FRED
(Federal Reserve Economic Data), a data collection cite from the Federal
Reserve Bank of St. Louis (https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?utm_source=research&utm_medium=website&utm_campaign=data-tools).
Then I would divide the GDP into the total revenues to achieve a percentage
rate. This is the method I used to calculate the federal rate of 3.77 based on
2012 data. All of this data in this table is collected on 2013 data.
This is the initial table I have generated from lowest to
highest percentage. Numbers in Millions. To view as Goggle spreadsheet. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1m1xAbhtdlrAgXMtw-tmeqtzzMIWN7QL3BlsK6j8tYKs/edit?usp=sharing
State
|
GDP
|
Tax revenue
|
percentage
|
|
1
|
MI
|
432,573
|
9,189
|
2.12%
|
2
|
WY
|
45,432
|
1,048
|
2.31%
|
3
|
NV
|
132,024
|
3,087
|
2.34%
|
4
|
CO
|
294,443
|
8,592
|
2.92%
|
5
|
SD
|
46,732
|
1,364
|
2.92%
|
6
|
MO
|
276,345
|
8,083
|
2.92%
|
7
|
AZ
|
279,024
|
8,583
|
3.08%
|
8
|
OK
|
182,086
|
5,604
|
3.08%
|
9
|
TX
|
1,532,623
|
47,281
|
3.08%
|
10
|
FL
|
800,492
|
25,021
|
3.13%
|
11
|
LA
|
253,576
|
8,103
|
3.20%
|
12
|
OR
|
219,590
|
7,296
|
3.32%
|
13
|
SC
|
183,561
|
6,251
|
3.41%
|
14
|
NH
|
64,118
|
2,283
|
3.56%
|
15
|
UT
|
141,240
|
5,093
|
3.61%
|
16
|
VA
|
452,585
|
16,421
|
3.63%
|
17
|
NE
|
109,614
|
4,052
|
3.70%
|
18
|
WA
|
408,049
|
15,772
|
3.87%
|
19
|
GA
|
454,532
|
17,980
|
3.96%
|
20
|
TN
|
287,633
|
11,403
|
3.96%
|
21
|
IA
|
165,767
|
6,637
|
4.00%
|
22
|
AL
|
180,727
|
7,314
|
4.05%
|
23
|
NC
|
471,365
|
20,559
|
4.36%
|
24
|
VT
|
29,509
|
1,289
|
4.37%
|
25
|
MD
|
342,382
|
14,958
|
4.37%
|
26
|
KS
|
144,062
|
6,341
|
4.40%
|
27
|
PA
|
644,915
|
28,822
|
4.47%
|
28
|
ID
|
62,247
|
2,799
|
4.50%
|
29
|
MS
|
105,163
|
4,738
|
4.51%
|
30
|
ND
|
56,329
|
2,547
|
4.52%
|
31
|
IN*
|
317,102
|
14,462
|
4.56%
|
32
|
MT
|
44,040
|
2,078
|
4.72%
|
33
|
CA
|
2,050,693
|
98,195
|
4.79%
|
34
|
NY
|
1,226,619
|
60,191
|
4.91%
|
35
|
WI
|
282,486
|
14,086
|
4.99%
|
36
|
AR
|
124,218
|
6,214
|
5.00%
|
37
|
IL
|
720,692
|
36,290
|
5.04%
|
38
|
KY
|
183,373
|
9,348
|
5.10%
|
39
|
OH
|
565,272
|
29,559
|
5.23%
|
40
|
ME
|
54,755
|
3,051
|
5.57%
|
41
|
MN
|
312,081
|
17,456
|
5.59%
|
42
|
DE
|
62,703
|
3,730
|
5.95%
|
43
|
WV
|
68,541
|
4,150
|
6.05%
|
44
|
NJ
|
509,067
|
30,922
|
6.07%
|
45
|
MA
|
446,323
|
27,169
|
6.09%
|
46
|
NM
|
92,245
|
5,655
|
6.13%
|
47
|
RI
|
53,184
|
3,324
|
6.25%
|
48
|
CT
|
249,251
|
19,366
|
7.77%
|
49
|
HI
|
75,235
|
6,234
|
8.29%
|
50
|
AK
|
59,355
|
7,476
|
12.60%
|
All number are in millions of dollars.
The results did surprise me with the lowest being Michigan and the highest being Alaska.
The results did surprise me with the lowest being Michigan and the highest being Alaska.
Now back to the Alaska anomaly. Most of their revenue is
derived from drilling and mining royalties, so that the average citizen does
not pay any taxes, but get an annual dividend, which makes them the lowest
percentage based on the individual taxes. It would be negative for the average citizen. However, it shows a large degree of
efficiency. They are able to capture a large percentage of their total GDP
without taxation. A feat I am sure many governors would want to achieve.
Although they need a lot of state owned property with valuable commodities.
Therefore, I will leave Alaska as a one off anomaly, barring any political change in the future for the lower 48 states.
Then I was surprised by Michigan being the lowest state
based on this criteria. However, I have not expanded this data, and have assumed
that all states are operating on a balanced budget basis, for this initial data
set, I will include bonds and deficits in the future.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)