How to Hide a Global Wealth Redistribution Scheme

This is not as hard as it seems. All you need is an EPA mandate and the right grade of commodities.

If you look at a diesel fuel pump in any American service station, you will see a sticker that basically says “After 2007, all diesel fuel must contain less than 7 PPM (part per million) Sulfur content.” And this is just the beginning with the next milestone to be 4 PPM and then it will most likely reduce even lower.

These mandates favor light sweet crude which primarily comes from North African regions and parts of Asia, with a few reserves in the gulf coast.  

This in essence elevates the prices on these reserves while degrading the prices on higher Sulfur content crude, since you increase the cost to refine the higher content crude, in order to remove the Sulfur content in the finished product.  And where does this crude come from, North America, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, and other places the US has historically bought crude from.

This is the simple way in which it works, The US and other developed countries pay a premium to purchase low sulfur diesel from the under developed countries, and continue to produce their higher sulfur diesel, in which they sell to the underdeveloped countries, and China at a lower price. 

In essence, you increase the market for low content fuel, thus increasing the price. While you flood the market for higher content fuel in the underdeveloped world.

Sense diesel is primarily used for transportation and agriculture, this higher price is passed on to consumers in the developed world. Meanwhile, the underdeveloped world sees a decrease in their cost of living due to the same conditions.  Thus you see a transfer of wealth to these countries, even if their inhabitants will probably not benefit. And at the end of the day you are still releasing the same amount of sulfur dioxide globally, you have just redistributed it to the third world. 

Equitable

I come to you, in order to ask for your help in promoting a concept that needs to be addressed in the current climate of political discourse. And the vehicle I am using to discuss and advance this is in the form of a book I am in the process of rewriting called The CUT Tax, on a free to read internet forum called Jukepop. http://www.jukepop.com/. I have included this link. http://www.jukepop.com/home/read/7409. To The CUT Tax.

I am rewriting this book in an effort to get feedback and critiques, in order to hopefully lay out an infrastructure that is easy to understand by anyone.

Today, we stand on the precipice of discussing the future, in the way in which government acquires the revenue to fund the infrastructure of our government.

Nearly every representative, political and financial pundit is aware that the current tax code is in serious need of reform. They only disagree on how.

The Fair Tax, Flat Tax, and tax reformers all have their champions, and critiques. Unfortunately, there is no visible champions for a new style of taxation that has the ability to make taxation equitable. And that tax form is a transactional tax.

This new form of transactional tax has the ability to be equitable, but not fair. I say this because fairness is an emotion, and truly cannot be equitable. Fairness requires the confiscation of what you view as excess from someone, and bestow it upon another you deem worthy. And that is the entire problem of the tax code to date. Indeed, all of the proposed tax codes that are set forth.

Every proposal that has been put forth, makes rules and exceptions to exclude certain individuals, and organizations, in an attempt to pursue the slippery concept of fairness. And this only leads to a higher rate that must be extracted from those that are not covered in their exclusions.

Ultimately, there is no true end user to any tax. All taxes cascade into the final cost of the goods and services that individuals use and consume. Therefore, my theory on taxation is to set a low fee that is collected on everyone, with no exclusions on the way in which we convert our time and resources into a medium of barter which we label as currency.

That is not to say that there will be no exclusions, only exclusion that could be counted as preexisting currency. This transactional tax is focused only on the generation of new revenue.

Due to technological advancements, and the new way people conduct business, we no longer need a cumbersome set of protocols for the government to generate revenue. And revenue is needed for the purposes of maintaining the infrastructure of government.

The free market system has already developed and is using this form of taxation on electronic transaction globally. I just believe it is time to study and adopt this fee structure into an inclusive tax form.

Millennial s

Everyone thinks that the millennials are cheap, lazy and expect something for nothing.

I see them as the first generation that has been brought up exposed to snake oil salesmen their entire life. They have been over promised everything since they were toddlers. From the toys they played with to the education they have received. Everything was advertised to deliver more than they actually received.

Therefore, if an app is shown to perform certain operations, they expect these operations to perform out of the box, with no tweaking, hoops to jump through or waiting for the third update before it works. So, yes they will complain about a 99 cent app that does not perform, and tend to wait for it to be free or workable before they commit to the product.

For now they do not blame the left for their troubles. After all the left has already received their money from the banks. That leaves the holders of the debt to complain about. And the left don’t care if the bankers ever get their money.

However, this is the short term. Soon they will give the left the blame they deserve, especially if they keep pushing programs that the millennials will ultimately have to pay for.

Not only will the millennials be left with the bill for the entitlements of the baby boomers, they will also be saddled with the debt incurred by deficit spending and declining health care and education, as the left continue to push to make these things free. Add to that the expansion of immigrants that are driving down wages, which the baby boomers need to reduce expenses and maintain their quality of life in there golden years.

So, yes the American dream has been dying. Because, the American dream dies, when you ask the government to guarantee it.